Tham khảo Neuro-linguistic programming

  1. ↑ Tosey, Paul; Mathison, Jane. “Introducing Neuro-Linguistic Programming” (PDF). Centre for Management Learning & Development, School of Management, University of Surrey. Bản gốc (PDF) lưu trữ ngày 3 tháng 1 năm 2019. Truy cập ngày 12 tháng 9 năm 2019. 
  2. ↑ Dilts, R., Grinder, J., Delozier, J., and Bandler, R. (1980). Neuro-Linguistic Programming: Volume I: The Study of the Structure of Subjective Experience. Cupertino, CA: Meta Publications. tr. 2. ISBN 978-0-916990-07-7. 
  3. ↑ Bandler, Richard; Grinder, John (1975). The Structure of Magic I: A Book about Language and Therapy. Science and Behavior Books Inc. tr. 5–6. ISBN 978-0-8314-0044-6. 
  4. ↑ Bandler, Richard (1993). Time for a Change. Meta Pubns. tr. vii. ISBN 978-0-916990-28-2. In single sessions, they can accelerate learning, neutralize phobias, enhance creativity, improve relationships, eliminate allergies, and lead firewalks without roasting toes. NLP achieves the goal of its inception. We have ways to do what only a genius could have done a decade ago.  Đã bỏ qua tham số không rõ |url-access= (trợ giúp)
  5. ↑ , ISBN 978-0-911226-23-2  |tựa đề= trống hay bị thiếu (trợ giúp)
  6. ↑ Bandler, Richard (2008). What is NLP?. NLP Life. Truy cập ngày 1 tháng 6 năm 2013. We can reliably get rid of a phobia in ten minutes – every single time. 
  7. ↑ Grinder, John; Bostic St. Clair, Carmen (2001). “Chapter 4: Personal Antecedents of NLP”. Whispering in the Wind. J & C Enterprises. ISBN 978-0-9717223-0-9. 
  8. ↑ Dowlen, Ashley (1 tháng 1 năm 1996). “NLP – help or hype? Investigating the uses of neuro-linguistic programming in management learning”. Career Development International 1 (1): 27–34. doi:10.1108/13620439610111408. 
  9. ↑ von Bergen, C. W.; Gary, Barlow Soper; Rosenthal, T.; Wilkinson, Lamar V. (1997). “Selected alternative training techniques in HRD”. Human Resource Development Quarterly 8 (4): 281–94. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920080403. 
  10. ↑ Thyer, Bruce A.; Pignotti, Monica G. (15 tháng 5 năm 2015). Science and Pseudoscience in Social Work Practice. Springer Publishing Company. tr. 56–57, 165–67. ISBN 978-0-8261-7769-8. As NLP became more popular, some research was conducted and reviews of such research have concluded that there is no scientific basis for its theories about representational systems and eye movements. 
  11. 1 2 Sharpley, Christopher F. (1 tháng 1 năm 1987). “Research findings on neurolinguistic programming: Nonsupportive data or an untestable theory?”. Journal of Counseling Psychology 34 (1): 103–07. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.34.1.103. 
  12. 1 2 Witkowski, Tomasz (1 tháng 1 năm 2010). “Thirty-Five Years of Research on Neuro-Linguistic Programming. NLP Research Data Base. State of the Art or Pseudoscientific Decoration?”. Polish Psychological Bulletin 41 (2). doi:10.2478/v10059-010-0008-0. All of this leaves me with an overwhelming impression that the analyzed base of scientific articles is treated just as theater decoration, being the background for the pseudoscientific farce which NLP appears to be. Using "scientific" attributes, which is so characteristic of pseudoscience, is manifested also in other aspects of NLP activities... My analysis leads undeniably to the statement that NLP represents pseudoscientific rubbish 
  13. ↑ von Bergen, C. W.; Gary, Barlow Soper; Rosenthal, T.; Wilkinson, Lamar V. (1997). “Selected alternative training techniques in HRD”. Human Resource Development Quarterly 8 (4): 281–94. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920080403. 
  14. ↑ Druckman, Daniel (1 tháng 11 năm 2004). “Be All That You Can Be: Enhancing Human Performance”. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 34 (11): 2234–60. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb01975.x. 
  15. ↑ Bandler, Richard; Grinder, John (1975). The Structure of Magic I: A Book about Language and Therapy. Science and Behavior Books Inc. tr. 6. ISBN 978-0-8314-0044-6. 
  16. ↑ Grinder, John; Bostic St. Clair, Carmen (2001). “Chapter 2: Terminology”. Whispering in the Wind. J & C Enterprises. ISBN 978-0-9717223-0-9. 
  17. ↑ Bandler, Richard; Grinder, John (1979). Andreas, Steve, biên tập. Frogs into Princes: Neuro Linguistic Programming. Real People Press. tr. 8. ISBN 978-0-911226-19-5.  Đã bỏ qua tham số không rõ |url-access= (trợ giúp)
  18. ↑ Bandler, Richard; Grinder, John (1975). The Structure of Magic I: A Book about Language and Therapy. Science and Behavior Books Inc. tr. 6. ISBN 978-0-8314-0044-6. 
  19. ↑ Stollznow, Karen (2010). “Not-so Linguistic Programming”. Skeptic 15 (4): 7. Truy cập ngày 1 tháng 6 năm 2013. 
  20. ↑ Wake, Lisa (2001). Neurolinguistic psychotherapy : a postmodern perspective. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-42541-4. 
  21. ↑ McClendon, Terrence L. (1989). The Wild Days. NLP 1972–1981 (ấn bản 1). tr. 41. ISBN 978-0-916990-23-7. In association with Milton's work, Richard and John also came across Castaneda's books, The Teachings of don Juan, The Yaqui Way of Life, A Separate Reality and Tales of Power. From there it was an integration of don Juan's use of metaphor and hypnosis and Milton Erickson's language patterns and metaphor to induce an altered state of consciousness to create deep trance phenomena. One of the most dynamic techniques which evolved out of the hypnosis programs was the use of the double induction. The double induction is a trance induction carried out by two people. One person speaks into one ear using complex words and language patterns to occupy one brain hemisphere and the other person speaks into the other ear using childlike grammar and language to occupy the other brain hemisphere. The feeling sensations are experienced in the same half of the body as the auditory input. This technique was used in conversations that Carlos Castaneda had with don Juan and don Genaro. This technique was used frequently during the summing up of Richard and John's training programs as a forum for review, post hypnotic suggestions for future applications and learnings 
  22. ↑ Bandler, Richard; Grinder, John (1975). The Structure of Magic I: A Book about Language and Therapy. Science and Behavior Books Inc. tr. 6. ISBN 978-0-8314-0044-6. 
  23. ↑ page 6 of Bandler & Grinder 1975a.
  24. ↑ Bandler, Richard; Grinder, John (1975). The Structure of Magic I: A Book about Language and Therapy. Science and Behavior Books Inc. tr. 6. ISBN 978-0-8314-0044-6. 
  25. ↑ page 6 of Bandler & Grinder 1975a.
  26. ↑ Clancy, Frank; Yorkshire, Heidi (1989). “The Bandler Method”. Mother Jones Magazine 14 (2): 26. ISSN 0362-8841. Truy cập ngày 24 tháng 5 năm 2013. [liên kết hỏng]
  27. ↑ John Grinder, Suzette Elgin (1973). "A Guide to Transformational Grammar: History, Theory, Practice." Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN 0-03-080126-5. Reviewed by Frank H. Nuessel, Jr. The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 58, No. 5/6 (September–October 1974), pp. 282–83
  28. ↑ E. Jane Bradley; Biedermann, Heinz-Joachim (1 tháng 1 năm 1985). “Bandler and Grinder's neurolinguistic programming: Its historical context and contribution”. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 22 (1): 59–62. ISSN 0033-3204. OCLC 1588338. doi:10.1037/h0088527. 
  29. ↑ Spitzer, Robert (1992). “Virginia Satir & Origins of NLP” (PDF). Anchor Point Magazine (July): ?. Truy cập ngày 5 tháng 6 năm 2013. 
  30. ↑ Grinder, John; Bandler, Richard (1981). Connirae Andreas, biên tập. Trance-formations: Neuro-Linguistic Programming and the Structure of Hypnosis. Moab: Real People Press. tr. 240.  Đã bỏ qua tham số không rõ |url-access= (trợ giúp)"artfully vague" occurs in the context of describing the "Milton-Model"
  31. ↑ Bandler, Richard; Grinder, John (1985). “Appendix II”. Trong Andreas, Connirae. Trance-formations. Real People Press. ISBN 978-0-911226-22-5. 
  32. ↑ doi:10.1108/13620439610111408
    Hoàn thành chú thích này
  33. ↑ Stollznow, Karen (2010). “Not-so Linguistic Programming”. Skeptic 15 (4): 7. Truy cập ngày 1 tháng 6 năm 2013. 
  34. ↑ doi: 10.1002/hrdq.3920080403
    Hoàn thành chú thích này
  35. ↑ doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb01975.x
    Hoàn thành chú thích này
  36. 1 2 doi:10.2478/v10059-010-0008-0
    Hoàn thành chú thích này
  37. ↑ doi:10.1037/0022-0167.34.1.103
    Hoàn thành chú thích này
  38. 1 2 doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1614.2005.01601.x
    Hoàn thành chú thích này
  39. ↑ Corballis, MC., "Are we in our right minds?" In Sala, S., (ed.) (1999), Mind Myths: Exploring Popular Assumptions About the Mind and Brain Publisher: Wiley, John & Sons. ISBN 0-471-98303-9 pp. 25–41 (see p. 41)
  40. ↑ Stollznow, K. (2010). “Bad language: Not-so Linguistic Programming”. Skeptic 15 (4): 7. 
  41. 1 2 doi:10.1037/0735-7028.37.5.515
    Hoàn thành chú thích này
  42. ↑ Lum.C (2001). Scientific Thinking in Speech and Language Therapy. Psychology Press. tr. 16. ISBN 0-8058-4029-X. 
  43. ↑ doi:10.1207/S15328023TOP2803_03
    Hoàn thành chú thích này
  44. ↑ Dunn D, Halonen J, Smith R (2008). Teaching Critical Thinking in Psychology. Wiley-Blackwell. tr. 12. ISBN 978-1-4051-7402-2. 
  45. ↑ doi:10.1097/ADM.0b013e3181c5f9db
    Hoàn thành chú thích này
  46. ↑ doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.05.013
    Hoàn thành chú thích này

Tài liệu tham khảo

WikiPedia: Neuro-linguistic programming http://www.american-buddha.com/bandler.method.html... http://www.skeptic.com/magazine/archives/vol15n04.... //dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fhrdq.3920080403 //dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.healthpol.2010.05.013 //dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F0022-0167.34.1.103 //dx.doi.org/10.1037%2F0735-7028.37.5.515 //dx.doi.org/10.1037%2Fh0088527 //dx.doi.org/10.1097%2FADM.0b013e3181c5f9db //dx.doi.org/10.1108%2F13620439610111408 //dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1440-1614.2005.01601.x